It has variously been described as “an incredible and almost unbelievable gaffe” (Radio Times), “the greatest mistake in Academy Awards history” (Telegraph), “an extraordinary blunder…an unprecedented error” (ITV News), “the most spectacular blunder in the history of the starry ceremony” and “the most awkward, embarrassing Oscar moment of all time: an extraordinary failure” (Guardian). It was, of course, the Grand Finale of the Oscars 2017.
This is the seventh in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on the Defunct archetype.
This is the sixth in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on the P.R. and Subterfuge archetype.
This is the fifth in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on the Projection archetype.
This is the fourth in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on the Ignorance and Fantasy archetype.
This is the third in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on the Taboo archetype.
This is the second in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on the Congruence archetype.
This is the first in a series of posts on The Archetypes of Human Work, on The Messy Reality archetype.
The analysis of work cannot be limited to work as prescribed in procedures etc (le travail prescrit), nor to the observation of work actually done (le travail réalisé). Similarly, it cannot be limited to work as we imagine it, nor work as people talk about it. Only by considering all four of these varieties of human work can we hope to understand what’s going on.
When we think about just culture, we usually think about accidents and incidents, associated ‘honest…
Humanistic Systems 